Swedish Medtech Summit 2023

QAdvis är så klart representerade på höstens Swedish Medtech Summit den 21 november i Stockholm. Kom och prata med våra konsulter Ladan Amiri och Krishnadev Moothandassery Ramdevan.

Konferensen kommer ge en belysning av hur vården– och omsorgen håller på att utvecklas och hur stor betydelse de nya teknikerna kommer ha i framtiden.

Som konsultföretag inom Medtech och med fokus på bland annat cybersäkerhet, mjukvara och klinisk utvärdering vill vi ta del av det som händer och de utmaningar som industrin och sjukvården står inför. Med vår kompetens och förståelse av komplexiteten kan vi på ett effektivt sätt bidra med den regulatoriska analysen och hjälpa till att identifiera vilka aktiviteter som behövs för CE-märkning av medicintekniska produkter. Inte minst med avseende på kraven för egentillverkning som med MDR 2017/745 och IVDR 2017/746 är tydligare reglerat.

Kontakta oss om du vill veta mer info@qadvis.com

Is it time to scrap the DHF, DMR and DHR?

To successfully navigate an inspection by FDA, it’s essential to maintain three separate buckets for your device files: the Design History File (DHF), the Device Master Record (DMR) and the Device History Record (DHR). However, with the upcoming update to the US Quality System Regulation, these terms may no longer be used.

Since 2018, the FDA has been working to align its Quality System Regulation QSR 21 Part 820 with the global standard for Quality Management Systems, ISO 13485:2016. And this is for a very good reason. The FDA played a key role in developing this standard and is also a member of the Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)accepting audit reports from MDSAP-recognized Auditing Organizations instead of FDA audits.

The implementation of this new regulation, Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)  has however faced repeated delays. But in May 2023 Dr. Jeff Shuren, director of FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) stated that the publication of the QSMR is a “high priority” for the FDA and should be out by the end of this year. So maybe the new QSMR will be a long-anticipated Christmas present.

The new regulation will eliminate most of the requirements in the current Part 820. Changes in the QSMR will primarily be made by referencing ISO 13485 rather than duplicating the exact text of the standard. However, some sections will include clarifications, and it’s crucial to remember that the other regulatory requirements will still apply. For instance:

  • 21 CFR Part 830: Unique Device Identification Requirements
  • 21 CFR Part 821: Traceability Requirements, if applicable
  • 21 CFR Part 803: Reporting to Regulatory Authorities
  • 21 CFR Part 806, Advisory Notices

A significant difference between the QS regulation and ISO 13485 is that the risk management requirements are integrated throughout all aspects of the quality management system in ISO 13485. This contrasts with 21 CFR 820, where the risk-specific requirements are only listed in §820.30(g) as part of design validation.

If you’re already ISO 13485 certified, changes to your system will be minimal. If you only operate within the US, changes will be more substantial.  If you plan to remain solely within the US, you don’t need to obtain a notified body or 13485 certifications. You can continue as before but follow the QMSR instead of the QSR. The FDA will continue its usual site inspections but will use its new audit method based on QMSR (i.e., ISO 13485) instead of QSIT.

It’s important to note that an inspection from FDA won’t result in a 13485 certificate since this is a government inspection and not a Notified Body audit. It’s also crucial to understand that even if you already have a 13485 certificate, the FDA will continue to inspect your site as long as you sell in the US, unless you participate in the MDSAP audit program.

While it’s uncertain whether the QMSR will indeed be published by the end of 2023, we will certainly keep a close watch on this development and hope that “a watched pot never boils” proves to be incorrect in this case.

In the next follow up article we will go through the major differences between the ISO 13485:2016 and the proposed QSMR.

If you have any question, contact us at info@qadvis.com.

FDA issues a new version of ISO 10993-1 guidance, which impact devices with intact skin contact

In September 2023, FDA released a new version of their guidance “Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1”.

In this version FDA guidance document , it is stated that:

  • FDA agrees with the ISO 10993-1:2018 revision regarding focus on minimizing the “number and exposure of test animals by giving preference to in vitro models and to chemical, physical, morphological, and topographical characterization testing, in situations where these methods yield equally relevant information to that obtained from in vivo models.”

The updated version also contains a policy for a least burdensome approach for devices that have intact skin contacting materials that are made from specific synthetic polymers and natural fabrics. FDA recommends that for these devices, specific material information is included in the premarket submission (PMAs, HDE applications, IDE applications, 510(k)s and De Novo requests) in lieu of biocompatibility testing. The approach also relies on certain parts of the QSR and post market controls to identify potential biocompatibility-related issues.

If you have any questions or need more support don’t hesitate to contact us at info@qadvis.com

Medicinteknikdagarna 2023

Upplever du att de medicintekniska regelverken är lite krångliga och ibland svåra att navigera i, kom och prata med oss. Vi finns i monter 113.

Vi är glada att få vara med som utställare på årets upplaga av Medicinteknikdagarna (MTD) som anordnas av Medicintekniska föreningen (MTF). Utställningen kommer vara på BioClinicum-Nya Karolinska Solna och ni hittar oss i monter 113.

MTD samlar flera olika aktörer och intressenter som på något sätt har en koppling till medicintekniska produkter. Det känns därför extra bra att få vara på plats och ta del av diskussioner om AI-tillämpningar, innovation och digitala lösningar och andra diskussioner som förs i branschen just nu. Med vår kompetens och förståelse kan vi på ett effektivt sätt bidra med den regulatoriska analysen och hjälpa till att identifiera vilka aktiviteter som behövs för CE-märkning av den medicintekniska produkter. Inte minst med avseende på kraven för egentillverkning som med MDR 2017/745 och IVDR 2017/746 är tydligare reglerat.