QAdvis is now Aureviaexpanding our capabilities together

We are happy to announce that QAdvis is now officially part of Aurevia. This change of name follows our company’s integration into Aurevia. The Aurevia brand was born in January, when Labquality, Artimed, Clinical Consulting, Kasve, and Prisma CRO merged under the same name. With QAdvis now proudly joining the team, we are further strengthening our expertise and services and together offering greater value to our joint customers. Scandinavian CRO is also joining Aurevia.

For years, QAdvis has been a trusted partner for companies navigating the regulatory landscape of medical devices and in vitro diagnostics. With extensive expertise and dedication to practical solutions, QAdvis has supported the industry in bringing safe, effective medical devices to market while ensuring compliance in a complex environment.

This legacy of excellence, customer focus, and dedication to quality continues as QAdvis becomes Aurevia, building on strong foundation while embracing new opportunities as part of a larger, united team across 4 European countries serving customers in over 60 countries.

“- Together, we connect our clients with our familiar, valued experts, supporting clients in enhancing their product development and quality management . Our team offers a growing skill set, not only within our core regulatory affairs and quality assurance business area, but also through collaboration with colleagues in Aurevia’s CRO business,” says Anna-Karin Alm, Head of QARA at Aurevia and formerly CEO of QAdvis.

Practical implications of change
For QAdvis clients and stakeholders, the name change will not impact ongoing projects — you will continue working with the same experts you know and trust. All contracts, NDAs, and bank details remain unchanged, while the offering to our clients is now supported by the expanded capabilities of Aurevia’s full-service team. QAdvis EAR and UKRP services and activities in the European Union and the UK remain unchanged.

What is Aurevia?
QAdvis further strengthens Aurevia’s regulatory affairs and quality assurance services and capabilities. Together, we provide QARA expertise covering the entire lifecycle of medical devices and in vitro diagnostics, from early development to post-market phases globally. Additionally, Aurevia operates as a full-service contract research organization (CRO) supporting pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and in vitro diagnostics, and EQA services ensure clinical laboratories meet required quality standards.

To learn more about Aurevia and our expanded offering, visit aurevia.com — and please note our new email addresses: firstname.lastname@aurevia.com.

We look forward to continuing our work together under our new name — Aurevia — with even more expertise, innovation, and practical solutions.

According to MDR 2017/745 “Devices shall be designed and manufactured in such a way as to ensure that their characteristics and performance during their intended use are not adversely affected during transport and storage…”  This implies the need for transport validation, meaning that you must demonstrate that the device quality is not compromised during shipping or storage — especially for temperature-sensitive, fragile, or sterile devices. You need to ensure that products maintain their safety, integrity and performance from the moment they leave the manufacturer until they reach the end user.

Transport validation is the process to demonstrate that your medical devices can withstand the conditions they will be exposed to during transportation, such as varying temperature, humidity, shock, and vibration—without being compromised. The process typically involves simulating real-world shipping conditions (e.g., drop tests, vibration tests, temperature cycling) and monitoring the actual shipments with data loggers.

Activities for how to perform transport validation:

  • Define product scope
  • Identify shipping method, routes, environmental conditions, consider worst-case-scenario
  • Perform a risk assessment to identify potential hazards and sensitivities
  • Develop a test plan, including criteria for approval
  • Conduct simulated testing and/or real-world shipment validation
  • Evaluation of the result
  • Summarize the validation report,
  • Re-validate any identified nonconformities

Ensuring adequacy in packaging for all logistical scenarios is important to ensure patient safety as damaged or degraded devices can pose serious risks during use of the medical device, and also to ensure regulatory compliance and reduce the risk of product loss, recalls, or reputational damage.

Key takeaways:

  • Integrate transport validation into your design and development process early.
  • Tailor the validation to product type, fragility, and risk class.
  • Periodically revalidate if shipping methods, packaging, or routes change.
  • Document everything in line with your QMS and regulatory requirements.
  • Transport validation isn’t just about ticking boxes—it’s about ensuring that devices arrive safely, ready to do their job where it matters most.

Contact us if you have any questions.

Follow us on LinkedIn!

For nearly 30 years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has played a pivotal role in shaping the global medical device industry through strict regulatory requirements, international cooperation, and adaptation to technological advancements. However, with significant changes on the horizon in the U.S., how will these developments affect medical device manufacturers in Europe?

The United States remains a crucial market for European medical device manufacturers. As the world’s largest medical device market, it offers significant opportunities for European companies seeking global expansion. Additionally, the complexity of the EU Medical Device Regulation has prompted some non-European manufacturers to prioritize the U.S. as their preferred market for growth.

In recent years, the FDA has made substantial investments to enhance regulatory efficiency and accelerate market access. Programs such as E-Star, the Breakthrough Devices Program, and the Total Product Life Cycle (TPLC) Advisory Program facilitate early engagement and prioritized review for innovative technologies. Furthermore, increased staffing and funding through the Medical Device User Fee Amendments (MDUFA) have strengthened the FDA’s review processes, ensuring a more efficient and timely approval pathway.

As of February 2025, President Donald Trump’s administration has proposed significant reforms to the FDA. The nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) signals a potential shift in the agency’s regulatory approach and priorities. Additionally, the administration is considering an executive order that could significantly reduce the FDA’s workforce. The administration has also indicated plans to streamline FDA ´s regulatory processes to accelerate the approval of innovative medical devices. Proposed measures include reducing bureaucratic obstacles. Specific details on the implementation of these changes have, however, not yet been fully outlined.

The current uncertainties surrounding potential FDA regulatory changes under the Trump administration create challenges for EU medical device manufacturers seeking U.S. market entry. A faster, less stringent approval process could lower barriers to entry, but shifting FDA policies may create unpredictability in compliance expectations, making it harder for EU manufacturers to align their regulatory processes. This regulatory uncertainty can affect investment decisions and long-term planning for companies looking to expand into the U.S. market.

The future development of the regulatory landscape in the U.S. remains uncertain and needs to be closely monitored by manufacturers intending to enter U.S.  At QAdvis, our Quality and Regulatory consultancy team tracks these developments to support our customers and provide a proactive approach to upcoming changes. Or, to paraphrase Charles Darwin; The one most responsive to change is the one most likely to survive.

Follow us on LinkedIn!

The Health Technology Assessment Regulation (HTAR), officially known as Regulation (EU) 2021/2282, marks an advancement in the evaluation of health technologies within the European Union. Effective from January 12th, 2025, the HTAR aims to harmonize the assessment processes for health technologies, including medical devices (MDs) and in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs), across EU member states.

Key objectives of the HTAR
The primary objective of the HTAR is to establish a structured and legally binding process for evaluating the relative clinical effectiveness and safety of health technologies at the EU level.

At the core of this process are the joint clinical assessments (JCAs), entailing a scientific evidence-based “analysis of the available clinical evidence on a specific health technology in comparison with one or more other health technologies or existing procedures, addressing a specific health problem”.

Once published, EU Member States will have to give due consideration to the JCA outcomes in their own national HTA reports. The information thus generated will allow national competent authorities to determine the relative effectiveness of new or existing health technologies and inform policymaking for the purpose of reimbursement and price negotiations at national level.

What’s in scope?
Under the HTAR, the implementation of JCAs is planned to be phased over time. Starting from 2025, JCAs will be mandatory for cancer medicines containing new active substances, advanced therapy medicinal products and a selection of high-risk MDs and IVDs. From January 2028, orphan medicinal products will be added to the list, and from 2030 all new medicinal products will be in scope of the HTAR.

High-risk MDs and IVDs
The following high-risk devices shall be subjected to JCAs:

  • Class IIb active devices intended to administer and/or remove a medicinal product and class III implantable MDs for which the relevant expert panels have provided a scientific opinion in the framework of the clinical evaluation consultation procedure.
  • Class D IVDs for which the relevant expert panels have provided their views in the framework of the performance evaluation consultation procedure.

Implementing acts will be released by the European Commission at least every two years to define which, among the high-risk devices listed above, will be selected to fall under the scope of the JCAs.

Importantly, according to the HTAR, the mandatory JCA process for high-risk devices should not delay or interfere with CE-marking of MDs and IVDs, nor should it delay their market access. Once the certification is obtained, manufacturers of devices falling under the scope of JCA are expected to contact with the HTA Secretariat and submit a summary of all the relevant clinical data supporting the device’s safety and clinical performance. Further guidance on how the application process will formally look like for MDs and IVDs is expected shortly.

What can I do as a manufacturer?
As a manufacturer of a high-risk device, it is advisable to ensure that robust processes are implemented for the collection and analysis of clinical data. Clinical evaluation (MD) and performance evaluation (IVD) reports are key documents in the dossier which the manufacturer is expected to submit for JCA.

To stay informed about the selection process for high-risk devices under the HTAR, and seek guidance on the actual application process, manufacturers are advised to:

Talk to us at QAdvis for professional advice –  we are always nearby and can help you navigate the new HTA Regulation!

Follow us on LinkedIn!